“Style anthropology can explicate a lot of otherwise tricky issues, in some cultures probably more than others. Sort of Like Water For Chocolate, only Weejuns...” LPC
Folks. There is no "D.C. Style"...There might have been trace and transient elements thereof ... fifty years ago when the Salons of Georgetown truly were headquarters of Foreign Policy creation. Today, your Nation's Capitol is a "three-button goof-ball" sycophant suck up hamlet. D.C. has no defined style.
I hear tell that in DC, a "pocket square" is an unknown contrivance, and if spotted, is likely to be thought of as an ADG-level of dandiness and outrageousness.
Was there a particularly egregious incident that triggered this post?
DC... the land of stockings and sneakers. ugh.
Waitafuckingminutehere !!! I thought that Maxminimus defined and updated "D.C. Style". Have I been on the wrong blog all these months? Jeeezus. This blog is all about ONE MAN ????!!!! What a fool I've beeeeeen. Arrrrgghhhh......
Anon...I am so sorry that you've been thinking that this blog is about anything but me. And little LFG. Now come sit in my lap.MegTown...Eggzackly.LimeGreenGal...nope.FogeyYoungEliptacalFaulkner...you are spot on.
I have a friend who works at State. He is considered dangerously well-dressed, Wears a pocket square AND a Drake's diamond point bow tie.
Eleganto...he is an outlier for sure.
I don't get into town much anymore but I do know that in the private clubs you will find well dressed folks. Best regards,JRC
Post a Comment